So, Tawana and Trevor said goodbye to everyone at five o’clock, left the party, and went directly backstage to prepare for the performance.


    As for the remaining guests, since they nned to watch the performance at seven o’clock, Mitsui Yoshitaka thoughtfully arranged a buffet. The guests gathered in small groups of three or five to eat and chat.


    Charlie Wade, ire, and Loreen formed a group of three and naturally sat at a table with Fei Kexin and Kelly West.


    Mitsui Yoshitaka came over to greet them politely before moving on to greet other guests.


    Halfway through the buffet, Fei Kexin’s phone buzzed with a notification from an American video tform. The title read: <i>A video of Tawana Sweet debating with a mysterious person on LGBT in Tokyo has been leaked.</i><h3 style="background-color:DodgerBlue">


    She eximed in surprise, “Mr. Wade, it seems the video of your debate with Tawana has been uploaded online!”


    “Really?” Charlie Wade smiled and said, “Click it and see if they censored it for us.”


    Fei Kexin opened the notification and saw that everyone in the video, except for Tawana, had been mosaiced, including Charlie Wade.


    She ced her phone on the table so everyone could see and said, “The video is mosaiced. Unless someone recognizes your voice, Mr. Wade, they won’t know it’s you.”


    Charlie Wade nodded and watched the video as it yed. It was clear that the footage had been taken from Trevor’s angle, and, as promised, Trevor hadn’t deleted any part of the content.


    When the video ended, Fei Kexin quickly opened thement section. At first, there wasn’t much meaningful discussion; most of thements were simple emojis or irrelevant remarks, simr toizens rushing to “grab the sofa” in other regions.<fn7d80> Fresh chapters posted on Find~Novel</fn7d80>


    This was likely because many peoplemented before watching the video. But within ten to twenty seconds, thements started growing rapidly, and substantive opinions began to emerge.


    In the debate between the two, thements soon became overwhelmingly one-sided. Most viewers supported the points made by the mysterious man in the video, praising them as reasonable and well-argued. Charlie Wade’s statement that <i>“it is not protection, but production of LGBT”</i> resonated deeply with many people.


    On the other hand, Tawana’s performance in the debate came across poorly. Herck of eloquence, weak logic, and wed arguments made her seem unreasonable and immature, almost like a child who couldn’t make her point stick.


    Moreover, because Charlie Wade emphasized issues regarding minors, audiences who agreed with him started to view Tawana’s previous public efforts as harmful. They believed her campaigns had unintentionally contributed to “poisoning” many young minds.


    This led to a wave of criticism directed at Tawana.


    Fortunately for her, Tawana had a massive global fanbase. Alongside her loyal followers, there were also casual listeners who enjoyed her music but didn’t necessarily like her as a person.